USRP spurious emissions

06.07.2012 20:47

As a side effect of a project I am working on at the Jožef Stefan Institute I have a USRP N210 on my desk. Together with an expensive stack of Rohde & Schwarz lab equipment it made for a fun pass time today after work hours while waiting in the office for the rain to stop. It is also an interesting subject for an investigation into those pesky practicalities of software defined radio.

It seems a lot of people forget that any software defined radio still depends on an old-fashioned analogue RF front-end. While the digital signal you feed to it might be perfect in every way, once it passes from the digital into the domain of D/A converters, mixers and amplifiers it is still vulnerable to non-linear effects, saturations and other such worldly imperfections.

Ettus Research USRP N210 without top cover.

In the case of this USRP, the first experimental transmissions we did with it were a quite awful sight on the spectrum analyzer, with the desired modulated signal merely 20 dB above a sea of spurious emissions spanning most of the RF front-end's 40 MHz bandwidth. After a bit of tweaking of signal amplitudes and RF gains though, the transmission did get into a somewhat useful territory.

It's interesting to see what happens when a single, constant-wave sine signal is fed to the USRP on the digital baseband interface as the spurious spectral lines that are produced offer some insight into what's happening behind the scenes in the RF front-end.

In the video below, the USRP N210 was fitted with the SBX daughterboard which was configured for 600.50 MHz central frequency and 0 dB RF gain. It was connected to a PC running GNU Radio software which was producing a quadrature signal with the frequency of around 100 kHz, amplitude of 0.5 and a sample rate of 1 Msample/s. In the first part of the video I varied the frequency of the baseband sine wave while in the second part I varied the ratio between the amplitudes of the I and Q components of the quadrature signal.

Signal analyzer was centered at the same RF frequency as the USRP, with the span of 500 kHz (50 kHz per division).

The highest peak on the screen, at around -50 dBm, is the desired signal. Everything else above the noise floor is unwanted. The most obvious of these spurious emissions is an image signal at minus the desired frequency and some 40 dB below it, and a third harmonic at -3 times the frequency. Image signal is usually a sign of bad image rejection in the mixer and the harmonic is probably created by non-linearities somewhere in the pipeline.

An interesting thing to notice is that the local oscillator (the peak that doesn't move) isn't at the center of the frame, but 6 kHz lower. It's hard to notice on this video, but the desired signal is actually positioned correctly, which means that the signal frequency is finely adjusted before the final mixing to account for this offset, either in the digital or analogue domain. Local oscillator is likely based on a fractional-PLL, which of course doesn't have infinite precision but can only be tuned in discrete steps, a fact that is hidden from you in the GNU Radio interface. This offset differs when you change the RF frequency and disappears in round settings (for instance 600 MHz), which confirms this theory.

Another interesting result happens when I mess with amplitudes of the I and Q signals on the digital side. As expected, another image frequency appears. But since this imbalance appears on the digital side, it is mirrored around the true central frequency and is offset from the image produced by the local oscillator by twice the 6 kHz offset. It even mixes somewhat with it in a non-linearity somewhere and produces a small spike on the other side of it.

Posted by Tomaž | Categories: Analog


Teething problems of noisy digital transmitters devoloped by programmer :-) Check for physisist approach. Beware of noisy wideband oscilators.

Posted by MMM

Add a new comment

(No HTML tags allowed. Separate paragraphs with a blank line.)